Jump to content

Paul

Members
  • Posts

    201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Paul

  1. He's this guy: http://forums.awesomedude.com/index.php?showtopic=8104
  2. I was too lazy to do that. Besides, why let some soulless piece of software decide such things when we have creative writer-types around to dream up more imaginative arguments?
  3. Just one question: does "clappity-BUMP" count as one word or two?
  4. Well, with all the personal connections, it's no wonder this story is coming through so real and heartfelt. Well, that and the fact that Dabeagle is just plain good at that anyway. In addition, we're again getting some great Dabeaglesque characters. On the quirky scale I'd have to rate Wyatt at the top; endearlingly so, but a real riot. Oh, and another thing: it's with really mixed feelings that I learn there's just one chapter left to go. I'm looking forward to seeing how Dabeagle resolves the story, but I'm going to miss all these guys.
  5. Part six is up: http://www.dabeagle.com/storymainpages/TU.html Yay.
  6. I've read Patrick O'Brian's entire Aubrey/Maturin series twice, and it's still there on the shelf in case the mood strikes again. I've been through all of Jack Vance's works at least twice, more frequently for many of them. Same with Wodehouse. Both of those I could give another go or two. Plenty of others.
  7. Extraordinarily sweet. http://awesomedude.com/ryan-bartlett/french-kiss/french-kiss.htm
  8. This continues to be top-notch Dabeagle. Eager for more. But in the meantime... did I ever mention that his stuff is eminently re-readable?
  9. If a story is presented complete, I can control the pace of my reading; there's no obligation to read it through all in one go. I can appreciate the frisson of aniticipation that serial posting can elicit, but for me that's more than countered by frustration and, all too often, fear that the thing won't be completed. Losing track of what's going on is, as Graeme mentioned, another downside, as well as keeping in mind who's who. Hell, that happens when I'm reading completed books as well, but that's memory and the aging process for you. Thank god for e-readers and their search function. But I'm not totally adamant; there are cases when the writing is so good I'm just glad to get what I get when I can get it. That's the case with EleCivil's latest, for example. But none of this prevents me from reading serialized works, mind you. For me, it's just not a plus.
  10. Delightful; Saki couldn't have done it better! ("Miss Jenkins' Work," actually, but I couldn't figure out how to edit the topic title.)
  11. Paul

    Commas!

    Interesting. Using that particular example, though, if I were speaking it aloud to someone and wanted to make sure I got the point across, I'd be inclined to put a stress on "frequently" and follow it with a brief pause. Nevertheless, the point comes across either way. It is, in a manner of speaking, a manner of speaking. I tend to be a bit more histrionic in my speech than the average person.
  12. Paul

    Commas!

    That article also explains exactly what was so rare about "O rare Ben Jonson."
  13. Just to be clear, I wasn't decrying beginning a sentence with a dependent clause per se, just stringing a bunch of them together one after another. It's like being on a merry-go-round.
  14. Scanning the topic list for this forum, I noticed this thread had new messages. Wanting to see what was being discussed, I clicked the link. Reading Colin's post about SmartEdit, I was reminded of a story on another forum. Writing it, the author had started each sentence in one paragraph with a dependent clause. Wondering if such software could detect something like that, I wrote this post.
  15. I had a couple friends with some version or other of the Apple ][ back in the day. In my then-computer-total-ignorance, I had no idea what they were talking about when they mentioned "DOS." It was this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_DOS
  16. I don't know anything about the legalities involved, but speaking strictly about how real-world individuals can fit into fictional works, I'd say there's a difference between citing their documented words and actions and having them interact personally, even second-hand, with the characters and events in your story. For example, it's one thing for your character to say something like, "Did you know that Real Personality A said he thought X about Y..." and another to have Real Personality A express those thoughts directly to your character. My personal reaction to the latter is that it introduces a jarring note that takes me out of the story. "Oh, really?" I find myself thinking. Of course, when the whole purpose of the story is historical fiction, that's a different matter, as in the case of Doctorow's "Ragtime," as has been mentioned. But for contemporary personalities, incidental introduction of them directly into the narrative usually comes off as gratuitous to me. And anything more involved than that gets into the area of fan fiction which, again as a personal matter, is distinctly not my cup of tea.
  17. It's like the story that Somerset Maugham didn't write.
  18. That fixed it for me on my iPad.
  19. The only reason I can think of for a non-gay disclaimer would be the hope of forestalling potential tirades from the easily-affronted. On the other hand, it's nice to expect that readers can behave like adults. Certainly the regular members here do. I personally find the warnings that many sites use to be variously amusing and icky. Stories preceded by a litany of subjects and themes: oral, anal, mast, BDSM, frot, scat, nose-picking, littering, gluten abuse, you name it.
  20. The story takes place in Sydney, Australia.
  21. While it would be interesting to see how he'd continue the story - as he did with Alec/Sasha in the Sanitaria Springs series - I think it works perfectly as a stand-alone. I wouldn't be looking for more sex in it, though.
  22. That actually wasn't a trademark issue; Warner's claim was filed with the Title Registration Bureau of the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America). It's a voluntary trade organization, though as signatories, both Warner and Weinstein are bound by its rules and the decisions of its arbitrator. In the end, Weinstein agreed to change the official title of their film to "Lee Daniels' The Butler." http://www.indiewire.com/article/mpaa-overturns-its-original-ruling-on-the-butler-title-harvey-weinstein-responds
  23. Maybe they could come up with a reverse Lend-Lease Act and send some out here to California.
×
×
  • Create New...