Gee Whillickers Posted January 15, 2012 Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 Well, this should be interesting. Made using the new-ish Participatory Cinema method of funding and effects, an indie film that looks like it'll either be a whole lot of amazing fun, or really, really bad. It turns out that after WWII ended in 1945, the nazis didn't disappear. They holed up in a secret base on the far side of the moon. Now, it's 2018, and they're ready to come back. In a big way. I give you: Iron Sky And another... (Language Warning) Here's the President of the USA in the film: Link to comment
blue Posted January 15, 2012 Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 One perceives a degree of parody and comedy going on there. Yeah, that's either going to be quite good or really, really bad. I've seen how websites and podcasts and fanfilms get done collaboratively, and they can be very well done. The effects and acting look good. We'll see what happens. I didn't see any space chimpanzees in the movie clips, but my money's on the chimps! Link to comment
The Pecman Posted January 15, 2012 Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 Jesus. One asks, if the Nazis had the technology to get in a rocket and settle on the moon in 1945, why didn't they just nuke the crap out of us? If you can get a rocket of people and supplies to the moon, why not a rocket from Berlin to Washington? It's about 230,000 miles closer. I'm all for a stupid, funny movie -- Airplane is one of my all-time favorites (and I even worked on it a little bit) -- but sometimes, stupid is just stupid. The effects look like total crap to me, but if it was really, really cheap (like a TV budget), I get that you can't exactly expect Avatar. Link to comment
Merkin Posted January 15, 2012 Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 I'm very interested in seeing how the occupant of the Oval Office plays this. Does she even know where the Moon is? Link to comment
Gee Whillickers Posted January 15, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 Camp parody is difficult to get right. So often, if not done exactly right, it comes across as stupid and crass instead of clever and funny. When someone hits the balance right, they usually have a cult classic on their hands. When they don't, which is far more often, the book or film or whatever gets tossed on the rubbish heap and is quickly forgotten about, except perhaps as an example of horrible work. The effects on this film I believe are mostly done by volunteers collaborating mostly over the internet and using home gear. In that context, I'm amazed they managed to do what is shown in the trailers. Of course, I don't know the details of the rest of it, just what I've read since finding this yesterday, but apparently that's the idea behind participatory cinema. Link to comment
Gee Whillickers Posted January 15, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 Okay, I have to retract some of what I wrote above. After some more reading, the participatory part of it is more about ideas, feedback, and money during the creation process. The effects themselves are mostly done by one guy, but yeah, low budget indeed for this kind of work. Link to comment
JamesSavik Posted January 15, 2012 Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 President Palin, space nazis are coming! Lock & load! I can see them from my house! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now